home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1995
/
1095.doc
/
001139_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Thu Oct 19 11:38:44 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-11-07
|
3KB
Received: by mail.webcom.com
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA153997924; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 11:38:44 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com>
Received: from pulm1.accessone.com by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA153937919; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 11:38:40 -0700
Received: from 206.64.63.166 (jeric.accessone.com) by pulm1.accessone.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA25798; Thu, 19 Oct 95 11:31:07 PDT
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 95 11:31:07 PDT
Message-Id: <9510191831.AA25798@pulm1.accessone.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: jeric@accessone.com
Subject: Re: ScreamerNet II operational options
To: John Gross <jgross@netcom.com>
Cc: lightwave@mail.webcom.com, adh@shell.portal.com, shf@netcom.com,
jason@newtek.com, brad@newtek.com, brian@newtek.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9510190941.A9738-0100000@netcom21>
X-Mailer: SPRY Mail Version: 04.00.06.17
Sender: owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
On Thu, 19 Oct 1995, John Gross <jgross@netcom.com> wrote:
>> The remote system worked as normal. The , uh, "home" client thought it was
>> rendering frames at one per second, pretty good, since the other was doing
>> 13 minutes per frame.
>>
>> Obviously this is wrong. Anybody have any input?
>
>The LWSN program on the host machine is not mapped to the proper content
>directory. Wherever it is started from. there must be a config file that
>it can read pointing to the proper content.
Hmmmm, I assumed (!) that SN would "inherit" the content directory from
LW-Layout.
A) Is there a separate config file for SN.....wait, that wouldn't make
any sense...
B) Does the LW host have to be pointing at the content directory? If
so, how would it handle batch renders starting in differing directories?
>JG
John, I'm sure you're right [ after all, you signed your last post "SN
King"! :^) ], I'm just not taking your meaning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Another poster perhaps inadvertantly implied that it mattered whether
SN or LW were first launched. Is this so?
It seems it would matter if A) SN is deriving its content directory from
the CFG file rather than pulling it out of Layout, because B) Layout, to my
knowledge, only changes the CFG file when it exits. Seems there could be an
update error in that situation.
****************************************************************************
** jeric@accessone.com | Synergy Graphix & Animation
** Welcome to Seattle, have a latte'! | Technical Subjects a Specialty!
** Don't make me force it down your throat.....
****************************************************************************
--
jeric@accessone.com sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com